When Meghan Markle married Prince Harry in 2018, the world believed they were witnessing the beginning of a fairytale chapter in the royal family’s story. But just years later, the Duchess of Sussex finds herself at the center of yet another storm — one so personal and biting that it reportedly left her in tears. A palace insider has delivered a scathing remark, labeling Meghan as the “most destructive royal ever,” a comment that has quickly become the talk of royal circles and beyond.
.jpg)
The claim, shocking in its bluntness, is said to have pierced Meghan deeply. Known for her strong public face, Meghan has often been portrayed as resilient against media criticism. Yet this remark reportedly felt different, carrying the sting of betrayal from within the palace walls. For Meghan, who has long spoken about her struggles with feeling unsupported during her time as a working royal, such words reopened old wounds and stirred emotions that she thought had been left behind.
Observers point out that the timing could not be worse. With Harry and Meghan attempting to reshape their public image through charitable work, media ventures, and appearances that highlight their independence, this kind of attack undermines their efforts. To be branded with such a title not only casts a shadow on Meghan’s reputation but also reignites debates about whether she and Harry’s royal exit damaged the monarchy’s standing.
For Meghan’s supporters, the remark is both cruel and unjust. They argue that she was thrust into a centuries-old institution that was ill-prepared for her modern outlook, independence, and cultural influence. To them, Meghan is not destructive but disruptive in a necessary way, challenging outdated traditions and forcing the monarchy to confront uncomfortable truths. Her emotional reaction, they say, is only human — a sign of someone carrying the burden of relentless scrutiny and personal attacks.
Yet palace insiders who share the harsher view claim that Meghan’s decision to walk away, coupled with her and Harry’s public criticisms of the monarchy, have left scars that may take years to heal. To them, her actions represent a rupture rather than a reform, a chapter in royal history that divided public opinion and destabilized the institution’s carefully maintained image.
Behind closed doors, reports suggest Meghan broke down in tears upon hearing of the insult, confiding in Harry and a small circle of trusted friends. Those close to her say the sting comes not from the media, where such criticism is common, but from knowing that the words allegedly came from someone inside — someone who once stood close to the heart of the palace.
This latest development reignites the question that has followed Meghan since her royal debut: is she a force for change or a symbol of division? While one comment cannot define her entire legacy, it does highlight how deep the fractures run between the Sussexes and the royal institution they left behind. What remains clear is that Meghan continues to stir powerful emotions — adored by many, criticized by others, and never ignored.