For decades, conspiracy theories have surrounded the tragic death of Princess Diana in the 1997 Paris car crash.
Recently, members of Diana’s family broke their silence, emphatically stating their belief that her death was not an accident. The family’s declaration has reignited the debate and public interest in the circumstances of her passing.
Princess Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, who has been outspoken about media harassment surrounding Diana, expressed suspicion over the official narrative. According to family sources, they believe covert forces within the establishment were involved in orchestrating the crash due to Diana’s strained relationship with the royal family and her growing independence, especially her relationship with Dodi Fayed.
However, extensive investigations, including the British Operation Paget and French inquiries, have repeatedly concluded that the crash resulted from reckless driving by the driver Henri Paul, who was intoxicated, and aggressive paparazzi pursuit. These official inquiries dismissed claims of conspiracy, stating Diana’s death was a tragic accident.
Notwithstanding the official position, the family’s public statement echoes Mohamed Al-Fayed's long-held belief that the royal family opposed Diana’s relationship with Dodi Fayed and arranged her death to prevent a marriage deemed unacceptable.
Among the points discussed by the family and highlighted in public statements are allegations that Diana was pregnant with Dodi's child and that their potential engagement was a threat to royal lineage, though medical reports doubt these claims.
The family's stance has polarized public opinion and stirred calls for renewed transparency and investigation into all aspects of Diana’s death.