For years, Sadiq Khan has tried to project himself as a unifying figure in London, but when it comes to King Charles, the tension is impossible to ignore. Behind the polite smiles and formal handshakes lies a deep chill that insiders say has only grown stronger with time. Khan, who should by role and position be seen as an ally to the Crown, has instead made it clear through words and actions that he is no friend of the King—and it has not gone unnoticed.
.jpg)
The friction between Khan and the monarchy has its roots in public clashes, where the Mayor of London has openly pushed back against royal traditions and priorities. Sources close to the palace claim Charles has grown increasingly frustrated by Khan’s dismissive tone, particularly when royal initiatives collide with City Hall’s agenda. Far from the respect normally expected toward the sovereign, Khan has often chosen to tread a different path, one that undermines the King’s carefully crafted public image.
At public events, the coolness between them has become difficult to disguise. Observers recall moments where Catherine and William were greeted with warmth and energy, only for Charles’s interactions with Khan to feel stiff, even awkward. Some describe Khan as deliberately distant, others as blunt in his manner, giving the impression of a man uninterested in playing by the rules of deference. For a monarch who values tradition and loyalty, this has cut deep.
What makes the situation more striking is how Khan appears to lean into his defiance. He has positioned himself as a modern politician willing to challenge centuries of custom, while Charles represents the weight of royal history. This clash of identities—progressive mayor versus traditional king—has widened the gap between them, creating a quiet but undeniable rivalry.
The Palace, of course, will never publicly admit the strain. Official statements remain diplomatic, polished, and carefully worded. But those who have seen the two men together say the truth is obvious: Khan is not on Charles’s side. For the King, who is already navigating family turmoil and public scrutiny, the coolness from London’s most powerful political figure adds yet another layer of difficulty to his reign.
In a nation where the monarchy thrives on unity and symbolism, the distance between Charles and Khan stands out sharply. It is not outright hostility, but nor is it friendship. And in the delicate world of royal politics, that cold shoulder may prove more damaging than an open attack.