King Charles III has formally approved final petitions from the House of Lords to review – and potentially revoke – Meghan Markle’s royal titles. The move could see the Duchess of Sussex stripped of her title as part of a growing push to redefine and reinforce the responsibilities and expectations tied to royal status.
According to insider accounts, Meghan Markle was reportedly “blindsided” and “furious” upon learning that the long-debated petitions to remove her Duchess title had gained serious traction — and now, royal approval. Palace aides say the Duchess “feels betrayed” and is deeply concerned about the personal and professional implications of losing the title that has long been at the center of her global brand.
The House of Lords petitions, which have circulated in various forms since Meghan and Prince Harry stepped back from royal duties in 2020, argue that individuals who no longer serve the monarchy in any official capacity should not retain royal titles. While the Sussexes agreed not to use their HRH (His/Her Royal Highness) styles, they retained the Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles — a situation that has remained controversial both within Parliament and among the public.
Royal watchers say King Charles had previously avoided taking a firm stance, hoping to keep the family’s internal rift from escalating. However, following several recent public controversies, including Meghan and Harry’s ongoing media appearances and their reported criticism of the monarchy, Charles is said to have lost patience.
“The King sees this as a necessary step to protect the integrity of the Crown,” one senior royal source said. “There has been mounting pressure from Parliament and the public, and the House of Lords made it clear — this issue can’t be ignored any longer.”
Meghan's reported reaction was swift and emotional. Sources close to the Sussex camp claim she “felt ambushed” and views the petition’s approval as a personal attack. There are even suggestions that legal consultation is underway, with Meghan allegedly exploring whether the move could be challenged on constitutional grounds.