Behind palace walls, the true stories are never the ones shown on glossy magazine covers or Netflix documentaries. For years, whispers have circulated about the contrasting experiences of those who worked with Meghan Markle compared to those who served Queen Elizabeth II. Now, staffers—past and present—are quietly shedding light on what life was really like under two very different women who held two very different kinds of power.
.jpg)
With Queen Elizabeth, staff describe a workplace built on quiet discipline, tradition, and a sense of duty larger than the individual. Even when the workload was relentless, there was a stability that came from her unshakable routine and calm presence. One longtime aide recalled how the Queen never raised her voice, relying instead on subtle gestures and a sharp eye to signal what needed to be done. Working for her was less about serving a person and more about serving an institution—something that instilled loyalty and, for many, even pride.
In contrast, accounts of working with Meghan paint a far more unpredictable picture. Some former employees describe her as ambitious, detail-oriented, and determined to modernize every process around her. Others, however, suggest that her high expectations created tension, with staff feeling the pressure of constantly shifting priorities and last-minute changes. Those who admired her drive say she pushed for innovation in a system that resisted it, while critics accuse her of being demanding to the point of impossible.
The most striking difference, according to insiders, lies in how the two women viewed hierarchy. With the Queen, formality was unshakable; tradition dictated every interaction. Meghan, on the other hand, blurred lines—encouraging first-name familiarity with some, yet reportedly bristling when things did not go her way. For staff, this created a dynamic that was far less predictable than the rigid structure of the Queen’s household.
What these comparisons reveal is not just the clash of personalities but the clash of eras. The Queen represented continuity and order, a steady hand that held the monarchy together through decades of turmoil. Meghan embodies disruption, a figure trying to pull the monarchy into a more modern, media-driven world. Staff caught in between experienced both the comfort of tradition and the chaos of change.
Now, with the Queen gone and Meghan’s role in the royal family severed, those stories are finding their way into the open. For the public, they offer a rare glimpse behind the curtain—a reminder that even in the world’s most famous family, the workplace dynamics can be as complicated, messy, and revealing as any office.