Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's alleged use of humanitarian efforts in war-torn regions, particularly Ukraine, to bolster their public image amid ongoing scrutiny and criticism.
Critics argue that the couple's well-publicized charitable actions may serve more as a strategic reputation repair tool than purely altruistic endeavors.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made headlines in September 2025 by donating $500,000 through their Archewell Foundation to aid children wounded in conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine. The grants were divided among organizations providing medical evacuations, humanitarian support, and prosthetics development for injured children. Harry personally visited rehabilitation centers, showcasing his commitment to raising awareness and support.
Despite these efforts, some royal experts and detractors argue the timing and publicity around these actions coincide suspiciously with attempts to redirect public attention from past controversies and strained royal family ties. Skeptics highlight past instances where their personal grievances and media appearances have overshadowed their charitable work, suggesting a mixed motive behind their philanthropy.
The couple’s upcoming acceptance of a “Humanitarians of the Year” award at a high-profile New York gala has sparked further debate. While supporters hail their mental health advocacy and social initiatives, critics accuse them of seeking accolades to legitimize their role in the royal landscape, especially after distancing themselves from traditional royal duties.