For someone who once declared her freedom from royal life, Meghan Markle seems curiously unable to let go of one royal relic — her title, “The Duchess of Sussex.” Despite walking away from official duties years ago, Meghan continues to brand, sign, and subtly market herself with the title she insists she doesn’t need. The latest proof? A freshly revealed monogram design that’s reignited debate about whether she’s truly moved on from the monarchy or quietly using it to maintain her influence.
.jpg)
The new monogram — recently spotted on personal stationery and rumored to feature a stylized “M” intertwined with a coronet — has royal watchers buzzing. While it’s not uncommon for former royals to keep personal symbols, what’s raising eyebrows is the timing. Meghan’s branding team has reportedly been working on a new lifestyle and media venture, and some critics see the use of the duchess motif as a strategic move to retain a regal edge.
Observers noticed that the design bears striking similarities to her earlier royal insignia, one that had been officially sanctioned by Buckingham Palace during her time as a working royal. The twist? The updated version subtly modernizes the crown, almost as if Meghan wants to appear both royal and rebellious at once. It’s a balancing act that perfectly captures her current public image — half-Hollywood, half-house of Windsor.
This is hardly the first time Meghan’s use of her royal identity has stirred controversy. From “The Duchess of Sussex” appearing on podcast and production credits to legal filings where she’s referred to by her title, the pattern is unmistakable. Even her personal website once leaned heavily on the duchess branding before being quietly reworked. Supporters argue that she earned the title through marriage and has every right to use it. Detractors say it’s hypocrisy at its finest — trying to distance herself from the institution while clinging to its prestige.
Royal experts note that this fixation could be more than vanity. “The duchess title gives her global recognition,” said one commentator. “In the competitive world of celebrity and influence, a title like that is worth gold. Without it, she’s just another former actress trying to build a brand.” Others suggest Meghan’s continued use of royal symbols is part of a deeper emotional tie to her past — a way of reminding the world she once belonged to something historic and powerful.
Even inside royal circles, the persistence of the title has become a sore point. Palace aides reportedly view the duchess monogram as a “provocative” move, especially when paired with her increasingly independent ventures. Some insiders say King Charles has been privately advised to “let it slide” rather than ignite another public feud, but behind the scenes, frustration lingers.
For Meghan, though, the duchess label isn’t just a title — it’s an identity. It links her to the story that made her one of the most talked-about women in the world. She knows it carries fascination, controversy, and curiosity — all things that keep her relevant in the public eye. Whether intentional or not, every new “duchess” reference reminds the world that Meghan Markle isn’t just another celebrity — she’s a royal renegade who won’t be forgotten.
And so the saga continues. A new monogram, another debate, and another chapter in the story of a woman determined to define royalty on her own terms — even if she has to keep calling herself “The Duchess of Sussex” to do it.